ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2025
Maximal dynamic inspiratory pressure: S-Index prediction values and diagnosis accuracy.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish reference values and prediction equations for the strength index (S-Index), in order to meet the growing demand for clinical application and diagnostic understanding of maximal dynamic inspiratory pressure.
methodsThis was a prospective study of 120 healthy subjects between 18 and 80 years of age. The S-Index, measured from RV to TLC after at least eight reproducible maximal maneuvers with a < 10% difference, was obtained. The MIP was also measured, and differences between S-Index and MIP values were analyzed. A multiple linear regression model estimating the S-Index value was based on clinically significant independent variables. For model cross-validation and diagnostic accuracy, we used a separate sample of COVID-19 survivors to compare the observed and predicted S-Index values.
resultsThe S-Index strongly correlated with the FEV1 and FVC. However, sex, age, weight, and height retained their significance in all final models, collectively explaining 62% of the variation in the observed values. The performance of the prediction equation was satisfactory in suggesting differences between COVID-19 survivors with an MIP < 80 cmH2O and those with an MIP ≥ 80 cmH2O. For both sexes, the S-Index exhibited the potential for ruling out, rather than confirming, inspiratory muscle weakness. If below the lower limit of normal, further evaluation is important, especially in men.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first set of reference equations for the S-Index based on a healthy adult population across various age groups in Brazil. Its potential as an adjunct index in evaluating inspiratory muscle strength was also explored for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.