Trial reportBJS open2025
Barbed suture versus preperitoneal ventral patch in medium-size ventral hernia repair: randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The prehabilitation paradox in ventral hernia: from universal to personalized care.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to compare preperitoneal ventral mesh patch with barbed suture in ventral hernia repair, evaluating recurrence rates and complications, and to assess the safety of preperitoneal patch placement.
methodsIn this randomized clinical trial, adult patients undergoing ventral hernia repair at Karlskoga Hospital between 2020 and 2023 were randomized 1 : 1 to either a ventral mesh patch repair group or a non-absorbable barbed suture repair group, blinded to patients and outcome assessors. The primary outcome was recurrence detected at clinical examination and CT verification 1 year after surgery. Pain (measured on a visual analogue scale and using the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire), nausea, and surgical site events (including wound infection, haematoma and seroma) were assessed 4 h, 1 week, 1 month, and 4 years after operation.
resultsOf 256 eligible patients, 209 were screened, and 205 were randomized to ventral mesh patch repair (103) or barbed suture repair (102). The hernia recurrence rate at 1 year was lower in the ventral patch repair group (1.9 versus 5.9%), although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.14). The surgical site infection rate at 1 month was significantly lower in the ventral patch group (0.9 versus 6.9%; P = 0.02). At 1 month, the ventral patch repair group had higher 'pain right now' scores on the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (P = 0.02), although this difference had disappeared by 1 year.
conclusionPreperitoneal ventral hernia patch repair is a safe and effective technique with a recurrence rate not statistically significant from that after barbed suture repair. Although postoperative pain scores at 1 month were higher after ventral patch repair, this difference had disappeared by 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.