ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
insilicoSV: a flexible grammar-based framework for structural variant simulation and placement.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Long-Read Structural Variant Analysis with single-nucleus RNA-seq to Elucidate Gene Expression Effects in Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Murine Database of Structural Variants Identifies A Candidate Gene for a Spontaneous Murine Lymphoma Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryStructural variants (SVs) are key drivers of genetic variation and disease in the genome. Their discovery remains challenging, however, in large part due to the scarcity of validated SV callsets and comprehensive benchmarks, which are essential for method development and evaluation. The growing number of data-driven learning-based approaches for SV discovery, in particular, requires large, diverse, and well-balanced training datasets to achieve reliable performance. To address this need, SV simulation has served as a key tool for assessing method performance and training SV models. However, existing SV simulators only support a fixed and limited set of SV classes and do not provide fine-grained control over the placement of SVs within specific contexts of the genome. Here we present insilicoSV, a versatile framework for SV simulation, which models SVs using a simple and flexible grammar, allowing users to easily define standard and custom arbitrary genome rearrangements, as well as encode genome placement constraints. This design allows insilicoSV to naturally support new and bespoke SV types, such as the complex rearrangements of cancer genomes. In addition to grammar-based modeling, insilicoSV provides built-in support for 26 predefined SV types, placement of user-provided SVs, small variant simulation, streamlined workflows for the simulation of genome evolution and genome mixtures, read simulation, alignment, and visualization. These features enable the creation of comprehensive genomic datasets for a variety of downstream applications, such as in-depth benchmarking of alignment and variant calling methods, as well as training of data-driven learning-based approaches for SV detection. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: insilicoSV is available under the MIT license at https://github.com/PopicLab/insilicoSV and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17402009.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.