ArticleBlood advances2026
No clear benefit of cellular therapy consolidation for patients achieving remission after post-HCT AML relapse.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypomethylating agents-venetoclax as salvage therapy for relapse of AML and MDS after allogeneic HCT.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- When remission alone might be good enough.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) portends a dismal prognosis. One approach for reinvigorating a graft-versus-leukemia response is consolidation with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) or second HSCT (HSCT2). However, the role of DLI/HSCT2 in patients who achieve complete remission (CR) after salvage therapy is unclear. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of 464 patients with post-HSCT AML relapse, focusing on those who achieved CR before consolidation with cellular therapy. In multivariable analysis (MVA), achieving CR after post-HSCT1 relapse was associated with improved overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; P< .0001). Of 133 patients (29%) who achieved CR after posttransplant AML relapse and before cellular therapy, 64 received DLI, 28 underwent HSCT2, and 41 received neither. Four-year outcomes from CR for the entire cohort (n = 133) were: OS 29%, relapse-free survival (RFS) 22%, cumulative incidence of relapse 58%, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) 20%. In MVA, there was no association between receipt of DLI (HR, 0.87; P = .59) or HSCT2 (HR, 1.08; P = .83) and OS. Furthermore, we did not identify a benefit with DLI or HSCT2 with respect to RFS, relapse, or NRM. Patients with donor chimerism <90% at the time of CR had reduced 4-year OS (20% vs 32%; P = .03), as did measurable residual disease-positive patients (17% vs 62%; P = .024). Our results question the benefit of consolidation with DLI or HSCT2 in patients with AML who achieve CR, and we identify high-risk subgroups that should be the focus of future studies with larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.