Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41172146›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025

An enhanced Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) using national health data on morbidity and medications.

Sören Möller, Marlene Rietz, Frederik Lykke Petersen, Jan Christian Brønd, Michael Kriegbaum Skjødt, Jens Søndergaard, Bo Abrahamsen, Katrine Hass Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Engineered bone-targetingMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  3. Introducing FREMArchives of osteoporosis · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sören MöllerResearch Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-4269
Marlene RietzResearch Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Frederik Lykke PetersenOpen Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Jan Christian BrøndDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Exercise Epidemiology, Centre of Research in Childhood Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
Michael Kriegbaum SkjødtResearch Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
Bo AbrahamsenResearch Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-6080
Katrine Hass RubinResearch Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5045-536X

Funding

Region of Southern Denmark 22/26197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major health concern in older individuals. Efficient case-finding is essential for timely risk assessment and treatment for high-risk patients. To prevent fractures and reduce the risk of subsequent disability, approaches offering clinically sufficient sensitivity with acceptable specificity are warranted. Although pharmaceutical osteoporosis treatment is effective, it is often diagnosed at a late stage, for instance, following a fracture. The aim of this study was to extend the existing Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM), which identifies individuals at risk of an imminent (1-yr) major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) based on administrative health data. This extension (FREMVer2) included data on morbidity and medications and evaluated age-specific risk cut-offs to enhance the risk assessment of MOF and hip fracture (HF) risk, respectively. We included the entire population of Denmark aged ≥45 yr at baseline (2022; N = 2 493 180), not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis or receiving osteoporosis treatment. The cohort was divided into 4 groups stratified by sex and age (<65 yr, ≥65 yr). Each of the 4 groups was randomly split into a 60% development, a 20% model validation, and a 20% cut-off validation cohort. All diagnoses from Danish hospitals and filled prescriptions from Danish pharmacies from 2007 to 2021 were used as possible predictors for MOF. These predictors correspond to information that in Denmark is automatically transferred to general practitioner's electronic health records; hence, prediction would be possible in general practice. Models were constructed by logistic regression with LASSO regularization, determining the preferred regularization hyper parameter by cross-validation and forcing categorical age to be included. Across subgroups, the models obtained poor to acceptable area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.656-0.714 for MOF, and acceptable AUCs of 0.728-0.764 for HFs. Additionally, the models achieved sensitivities of around 80% or higher in almost all subgroups. This performance, together with the available predictors, makes FREMver2 a feasible decision support system as a step toward an opportunistic screening program in health care settings with access to administrative data.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsadministrative health dataautomated risk calculationdecision support toolgeneral practicehip fracturemajor osteoporotic fractureosteoporosisregister datarisk predictionscreening

Identifiers

PMID41172146
PMCPMC12765684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.