Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41172144›Full record

ReviewMutagenesis2025

The use of DNA repair inhibitors and the comet assay-an overview.

E Saenz-Martinez, A López de Cerain, A Azqueta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutagenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Saenz-MartinezDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
A López de CerainDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
A AzquetaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard comet assay detects DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites, but these lesions are nonspecific. They may result directly from genotoxic agents or arise as intermediates during the repair of other DNA damage, such as oxidized bases or bulky DNA adducts. Different approaches have been developed to generate or trap these repair intermediates, making them detectable with the comet assay. Recently, the combination of the comet assay with DNA repair inhibitors like hydroxyurea and cytosine arabinoside has been proposed to detect bulky DNA adducts. These lesions are mainly repaired through nucleotide excision repair, a process that transiently produces strand breaks when damaged oligonucleotides are excised. Normally, these intermediates are rapidly repaired by DNA resynthesis and ligation. However, by inhibiting this repair step, strand breaks persist and can be detected by the comet assay. This strategy has been applied in various fields, including genotoxicity testing, environmental toxicology, human biomonitoring, and studies on DNA repair kinetics. This review focuses specifically on the use of hydroxyurea, cytosine arabinoside, and aphidicolin in in vitro experiments to evaluate the utility and specificity of this method for detecting different types of DNA lesions. Notably, in ~70% of studies reviewed, the inclusion of DNA repair inhibitors led to a significant increase in DNA damage, highlighting the added value of this approach. However, although the method enhances sensitivity to bulky adducts, it also responds to other types of damage, such as those induced by alkylating or oxidative agents.

Indexed as

Comet AssayDNA RepairAnimalsCytarabineDNA AdductsDNA DamageHumansHydroxyureaCytarabineDNA AdductsHydroxyureaaphidicolincomet assaycytosine arabinosideDNA repair inhibitorshydroxyurea

Identifiers

PMID41172144
PMCPMC12720409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.