ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026
Applying Progress Testing to Undergraduate Periodontal Courses-A First Evaluation After 2 Years of Use in a German University.
Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying Progress Testing to Undergraduate Periodontal Courses-A First Evaluation After 2 Years of Use in a German University.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Effect of massed versus distributed preclinical training on subgingival instrumentation skill across the preclinical-to-clinical transition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Progress Test in Periodontology (PTP) has been implemented at Kiel University to gain an impression of students' learning process in this specific subdiscipline of periodontology within the dental curriculum.
methodsThe PTP has been designed following internationally established standards and has been adapted into the context of periodontology. From July 2020 to February 2022, it has been applied to undergraduate students. The PTP consists of 30 single-best answer questions including an 'I don't know' option, drawn from a newly created question bank and weighted by an adapted blueprint. Descriptive analysis and statistics to test validity and reliability have been performed.
resultsThe mean score shows a significant growth over the semesters (42.4% ± 11.7% after the first semester, 61.5% ± 13.8% after the second semester, 76.9% ± 12.8% after the third semester, 69.9% ± 12.7% after the fifth semester). Reliability expressed by Cronbach's α ranges from 0.646 to 0.798. The 'I don't know' option has mainly been used by first semester students.
conclusionWithin the limitations of the study, the PTP is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate students' gain of knowledge, even if it is limited to one subject within a curriculum. Due to pandemic restrictions several other challenges in the adaptation of the test format to the educational setting at a German university had to be solved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.