ArticleQualitative health research2025
Recruitment Strategies to Prevent Fraudulent Virtual Enrollment While Respecting Privacy in Vulnerable Populations.
Article in Qualitative health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Web-Based Virtual Environment Behavioral Intervention as Cardiovascular Disease and Metabolic Disease Prevention Education in Persons With HIV: Evaluation of the LEARN Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- "I love my baby more than they do": infant feeding decision-making among mothers living with HIV in the United States.AIDS care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recruitment for qualitative research can have an added level of complexity when working with vulnerable populations, as stigma and confidentiality may play an important role in participants' willingness to engage. For example, people with HIV and other stigmatizing conditions may prefer to use a pseudonym to maintain confidentiality and may be discouraged from participation if asked to produce proof of diagnosis with a stigmatized condition. However, efforts to respect participant privacy and minimize burden while providing compensation for their time may leave studies vulnerable to infiltration by ineligible individuals who are motivated by the compensation. This article describes how efforts to respect the unique concerns of a vulnerable and stigmatized population, people who considered breastfeeding while living with HIV, resulted in the enrollment of non-eligible individuals in an in-depth interview study. We describe how the breach was discovered and the subsequent actions taken to balance study integrity with meeting the privacy needs of the target population. This example illuminates how scientific validity can be threatened by enrollment of individuals misrepresenting a target population, and the importance of developing approaches to ensure that vulnerable target populations can be reached while respecting privacy needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.