ArticleScience advances2025
The editable landscape of the yeast genome reveals hotspots of structural variant formation.
Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From junk to deleterious: Natural subtelomeric repeat amplifications impact fitness and cellular phenotypes in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is unclear how CRISPR editing outcomes vary across the genome and whether undesirable events such as structural variants (SVs) are predictable or preventable. To define a genome-wide map of editability, we performed whole-genome sequencing on 1875 budding yeast clones edited across 16 chromosomes by CRISPR-Cas9 and donor-templated repair. We found that unintended edits, including short indels and SVs, were enriched in specific genomic and sequence contexts. We developed a predictive model, SCORE (System for CRISPR Outcome and Risk Evaluation), which revealed 4.8% of the genome as SV prone, consisting of 562 SV hotspots. Donor repair-enhancing strategies suppressed SV formation in regions with moderate, but not high, predicted risk. Applying SCORE to the Sc2.0 synthetic yeast genome revealed a markedly altered SV landscape due to the removal of endogenous repetitive elements and the insertion of loxP sites. Our study provides the genome-scale map of SV hotspots after CRISPR editing and predictive and experimental tools to mitigate their formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.