ArticlePloS one2025
Design and optimization of soft finger actuators for rehabilitation applications: A combined finite element and neural network approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Piecewise Parameter Optimization of the Neo-Hookean Model for Hyperelastic Silicone Rubber with Large Deformation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design an anthropomorphic dexterous hand for expressive piano performance.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of soft finger actuators using finite element modeling to assess their performance in various structural configurations. By conducting detailed numerical simulations, we explore how variations in structural parameters influence the bending angle, thereby guiding iterative design improvements. Specifically, the research examines the impact of critical design factors, such as the number of bellows, actuator height, surrounding thickness, and foot thickness, on the bending behavior of soft actuators. The objective is to optimize these actuators for use in rehabilitation training gloves, where precise motion control is para-mount. Our findings reveal that increasing both the height and the number of bellows significantly enhances the achievable bending angle, facilitating more effective rehabilitation exercises. In contrast, greater foot and surrounding thicknesses exhibit a restrictive effect on bending, underscoring the need to carefully consider these parameters in design processes. These insights are instrumental in formulating design guidelines that aim to optimize actuator performance in therapeutic applications. Crucially, the manuscript presents a rigorous comparison between the experimental results and simulation results, demonstrating a high degree of concordance that validates the FEM approach and the predictions of the neural networks. This close match between the observed and predicted data not only confirms the reliability of the simulations, but also enhances the credibility of the design recommendations for rehabilitation applications. Furthermore, the study uses artificial neural networks to predict bending angles with high precision. With a residual variance of just 0. 74% and an explained variance of 99. 26%, the neural network model demonstrates exceptional predictive capacity, highlighting its potential as a tool for further refinement of the design and optimization of the performance of soft actuators. This research not only advances our understanding of soft actuator mechanics, but also contributes to the development of more effective rehabilitation technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.