Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171888›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Factors influencing trustworthiness and perceived biases of medical information and genetic testing for Black and White Americans.

Crystal Lederhos Smith, Brian Connor Stark, McKenna Kobalter, Mary Carol Barks, Mariko Nakano-Okuno, Ellen Weger Romesburg, Nita Limdi, Thomas May

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Crystal Lederhos SmithWashington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-2822
Brian Connor StarkWashington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4286-2217
McKenna KobalterWashington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.
Mary Carol BarksWashington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-5524
Mariko Nakano-OkunoThe University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-3212
Ellen Weger RomesburgWashington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1732-2490
Nita LimdiThe University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-8406
Thomas MayWashington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-9374

Funding

Integrating Genomic Risk Assessment for Disease Management in a Clinical PopulationU01HG011167 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JAMES J CIMINO, NITA A LIMDI · 2020 to 2026
$9.3M
Pharmacogenomic Testing to Optimize Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: Acceptability and Feasibility TrialK01DA060359 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Crystal Lederhos Smith · 2025 to 2026
$390k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011167NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA060359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring diversity in genomic research is crucial to address disparities in healthcare benefits experienced by Black Americans and other minority groups. Despite progress in promoting diversity, Black Americans remain underrepresented in most genetic studies, resulting in unequal access to the benefits of genetic medicine. This study investigates trusted sources of medical and genetic testing information among Black and White Americans, identifying key factors that influence trust and participation in genetic research. Using an online survey of 1,018 participants (Black Americans n = 500, White Americans n = 518), we analyzed trust and bias ratings across various sources, including medical providers, genetic counselors, and social media. Medical providers emerged as the most trusted source for both medical and genetic information across racial groups. In terms of bias, social media was viewed as most biased and medical providers as least biased across both groups. However, Black Americans reported significantly lower trust in medical providers and scientific literature compared to White Americans. Furthermore, Black Americans expressed a stronger preference for receiving medical information from individuals of the same race or ethnicity. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring communication outlets and strategies to address the specific trust concerns of underrepresented populations. Efforts to engage Black Americans in genetic research may benefit from increased involvement of medical providers and genetic counselors, improved transparency, and culturally relevant communication. By addressing these factors, the research community can work towards reducing disparities and promoting equitable access to the benefits of genetic medicine.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanGenetic TestingTrustWhiteAdultAgedFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacismSocial MediaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41171888
PMCPMC12591488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.