ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Transfer learning for predicting acute myocardial infarction using electrocardiograms.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Occlusion Myocardial Infarctions in the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the emergency department, it is important to quickly and accurately identify patients at risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). One of the main tools for detecting AMI is the electrocardiogram (ECG), which can be difficult to interpret manually. There is a long history of applying machine learning algorithms to ECGs, but such algorithms are quite data hungry, and correctly labeled high-quality ECGs are difficult to obtain. Transfer learning has been a successful strategy for mitigating data requirements in other applications, but the benefits for predicting AMI are understudied. Here we show that a straightforward application of transfer learning leads to large improvements also in this domain. We pre-train models to classify sex and age using a collection of 840 k ECGs from non-chest-pain patients, and fine-tune the resulting models to predict AMI using 44 k ECGs from chest-pain patients. The results are compared with models trained without transfer learning. We find a considerable improvement from transfer learning, consistent across multiple state-of-the-art ResNet architectures and data sizes, with the best performing model improving from 0.79 AUC to 0.85 AUC. This suggests that even a simple form of transfer learning from a moderately sized dataset of non-chest-pain ECGs can lead to major improvements in predicting AMI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.