Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Conditional VAE for personalized neurofeedback in cognitive training.

Imad Eddine Tibermacine, Samuele Russo, Gianmarco Scarano, Giancarlo Tedesco, Abdelaziz Rabehi, Amel Ali Alhussan, Doaa Sami Khafaga, Marwa M Eid, El-Sayed M El-Kenawy, Christian Napoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Imad Eddine TibermacineDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4729-7128
Samuele RussoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gianmarco ScaranoDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo TedescoDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abdelaziz RabehiLaboratory of Telecommunications and Smart Systems, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, University of Djelfa, Djelfa, Algeria.
Amel Ali AlhussanDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Doaa Sami KhafagaDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9843-6392
Marwa M EidFaculty of Artificial Intelligence, Delta University for Science and Technology, Mansoura, Egypt.
El-Sayed M El-KenawySchool of ICT, Faculty of Engineering, Design and Information and Communications Technology (EDICT), Bahrain Polytechnic, Isa Town, Bahrain.
Christian NapoliDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) offers great potential in healthcare, especially in the analysis of complex physiological signals like electroencephalography (EEG). EEG recordings hold valuable insights into neurological function and can aid in diagnosing various conditions. In this work, we explore the use of a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) that injects a binary health label (healthy or orthopedic impairment) into both the encoder input and the latent space coupled with the extracted features, leveraging the conditional input vector to learn representations specific to different health conditions. Our study involved using two public OpenNeuro datasets [1,2]. From the healthy dataset we randomly selected seven subjects to match the seven impaired participants; in both sets we retained the same 11 scalp channels (C3, Cz, C4, FC3, FCz, FC4, CP3, CPz, CP4, F3, F4). Six descriptors-Short time Fourier Transform (STFT), Hurst Exponent (HE), Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA), Correlation Dimension (CD), Kolmogorov-Sinai Entropy (permutation entropy; KS-proxy), and the Largest Lyapunov Exponent (LLE)-are extracted channel-wise and concatenated to form the input feature vector, which distills distinct characteristics from the EEG signals. We rigorously evaluated the performance of our CVAE model in combination with each feature extraction technique. The conditional supply of class labels to both encoder and decoder enabled the CVAE to achieve 93% accuracy on the unseen test split of the dataset with precision of 93%, a recall of 93%, and an F1-score of 0.93 outperforming re-trained CNN baselines. These results highlight the promise of CVAEs and the significance of well-suited feature extraction for robust EEG classification. This work could contribute to the development of automated healthcare diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

CognitionNeurofeedbackAdultAlgorithmsCognitive TrainingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41171856
PMCPMC12578254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.