Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171846›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction.

Ningyu Xu, Qi Zhang, Chao Du, Qiang Luo, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang, Menghan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ningyu XuCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0009-0002-3496-0272
Qi ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-4942
Chao DuResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-0967
Qiang LuoResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-6039
Xipeng QiuCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xuanjing HuangCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9197-9426
Menghan ZhangInstitute of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-862X

Funding

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 62236004MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 62376061MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 62476061MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) T2122007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People acquire concepts through rich physical and social experiences and use them to understand and navigate the world. In contrast, large language models (LLMs), trained solely through next-token prediction on text, exhibit strikingly human-like behaviors. Are these models developing concepts akin to those of humans? If so, how are such concepts represented, organized, and related to behavior? Here, we address these questions by investigating the representations formed by LLMs during an in-context concept inference task. We found that LLMs can flexibly derive concepts from linguistic descriptions in relation to contextual cues about other concepts. The derived representations converge toward a shared, context-independent structure, and alignment with this structure reliably predicts model performance across various understanding and reasoning tasks. Moreover, the convergent representations effectively capture human behavioral judgments and closely align with neural activity patterns in the human brain, providing evidence for biological plausibility. Together, these findings establish that structured, human-like conceptual representations can emerge purely from language prediction without real-world grounding, highlighting the role of conceptual structure in understanding intelligent behavior. More broadly, our work suggests that LLMs offer a tangible window into the nature of human concepts and lays the groundwork for advancing alignment between artificial and human intelligence.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLanguageAdultBrainComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleAIcognitive scienceconceptual representationslarge language models

Identifiers

PMID41171846
PMCPMC12595492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.