ArticlePloS one2025
Formulation and validation of a regional household wealth index for sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new era in global health assistance requires a focus on efficiently using limited and declining donor funds. This shift requires better evaluation methods to allocate resources effectively. Most evaluations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) examine health disparities within countries, but it is also crucial to assess health outcomes at an inter-country level based on national wealth. Cross-country studies support resource reallocation to the neediest nations and help transition programs like HIV responses within countries with better health infrastructure. This paper presents an unsupervised machine learning method, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), applied to household surveys from 15 African countries to create a universal wealth index that allows multiple countries to be compared on a common scale. Our method places households on a regional wealth scale, enabling cross-country comparisons of health indicators. We used a pooled dataset of 136,086 households from 15- Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) countries and validated our universal ranking approach against a local wealth indicator adjusted for macroeconomic differences. The results showed coherence between the macroeconomic-adjusted multinational scale and the PCA-created regional scale, supporting the method's usability for regional household rankings. The proposed method relocates households, as citizens of the world, on a regional wealth scale compared to most surveys that rank them by income placements in their local states. The validation results suggest that the direction and magnitude of mobility of households from national to regional scale in both methods were adequately coherent, ensuring the usability of our approach in ranking households regionally. The PCA-created border-agnostic wealth quintiles enable policymakers to optimize their efficiency improvement efforts, which promises superior efficiency gains over the siloed localized efficiency improvements. Our approach, tested on PHIA-participating countries, can be replicated for similar surveys to study utilization patterns and health outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.