ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Enhancing the use of routine program data for immunization decision-making: The role of coincidence analysis in localized learning and adaptation.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategic positioning of immunization at the heart of Africa's health and development agenda.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-world program data, collected through information management systems and activities like supportive supervision, are abundant in many low- and middle-income countries across the world. These data can be harnessed for systems learning to improve immunization decision-making and address disparities in vaccination coverage. However, effective systems learning relies on pragmatic causal reasoning, and the main question is: "How can these routine program data be used to support causal learning to improve equity in vaccination?" This commentary introduces coincidence analysis as a supplementary tool that can facilitate causal learning in vaccination settings using existing real-world program data. This innovative tool employs a custom-built algorithm for causal inference. It can help immunization stakeholders better understand implementation conditions across districts by using a configurational approach that identifies causal structures and chains. Such insights can guide tailored strategies for optimizing service delivery in underserved areas such as conflict zones, informal urban settlements, and remote villages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.