ArticlePloS one2025
E-health literacy levels of multiple sclerosis patients in Lebanon.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived E-Health Literacy and Cyberchondria Among Undergraduate Sports Science Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Communication Difficulties and Associations With Health Literacy, Medication Beliefs, and Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- The Role of Emotions in Health Literacy and Patient Education: Trends, Technologies, and Future Opportunities-A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaving high levels of e-health literacy has been shown to positively influence health-promoting behaviors by empowering patients with greater self-efficacy and improving their health management. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Lebanon presents a unique case for studying e-health literacy due to several socio-economic and healthcare-specific challenges faced by this population.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate the e-health literacy levels of MS patients in Lebanon and identify the barriers they face when accessing health-related information online.
methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining an online structured survey with qualitative in-depth interviews. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) was incorporated to quantify participants' e-health literacy levels, selected for its well-established reliability and validity, as well as its availability in both English and Arabic. Additionally, the Lily Model was used to guide various phases of the study, providing a conceptual framework for understanding and interpreting e-health literacy.
resultsAmong participants, 45 (31.5%) had limited eHEALS scores while 98 (68.5%) had sufficient eHEALS scores, indicating an overall sufficient e-health literacy among MS patients. However, qualitative findings revealed previously unidentified challenges, including limited confidence in assessing the credibility of online content, emotional distress triggered by exaggerated MS information online, and high reliance on general search engines and social media platforms. Participants expressed lack of access to trusted disease-specific information and voiced a need for professional guidance and well-established peer support.
conclusionThese findings call for targeted health promotion interventions to enhance this population's e-health literacy levels. It is important to equip MS patients from the point of diagnosis with the necessary skills and self-efficacy to effectively utilize online health resources and enhance their disease management journey. This calls for coordinated efforts from well-established MS patient groups, healthcare providers, academic and private institutions to support and empower this population in navigating the digital health landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.