ArticlePloS one2025
Dynamic forecasting and mechanisms of volatility synchronization in complex financial systems.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synchronization, which has been a common natural phenomenon, occurs frequently in complex financial systems and is an important contagion mechanism for systemic financial risks and even financial crises. In view of this, we construct a coupled stochastic volatility model and its volatility synchronization analysis framework and combine machine learning methods and rolling cycle window to propose a prediction method for dynamic volatility synchronization. Taking the Shanghai Composite Index (SSEC) and Shenzhen Component Index (SZI) as binary synchronization examples, we analyze the dynamic forecasting performance of the proposed method in an in-sample and out-of-sample empirical comparison by combining multiple loss functions and Superior Predictive Ability (SPA) tests for high-frequency data. It is found that the in-sample estimates of our proposed model are highly consistent with the market behavior and that the model outperforms other models in predicting stock market volatility synchronization accuracy. In addition, by combining dynamic simulation with multivariate empirical mechanism analysis, our methodology not only explores synchronization dynamics but also identifies significant risk events, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding complex system behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.