ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Risk factors and predictive performance for first healthcare encounter indicating homelessness using administrative data among Calgary residents diagnosed with addiction or mental health conditions.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals diagnosed with addiction or mental health (AMH) conditions are more likely to experience potentially adverse outcomes of homelessness. Despite their link to later outcomes, research on initial episodes of AMH outcomes is limited. This study aims to use administrative data to identify the factors associated with the first healthcare encounters with indicators of homelessness (FHE-H) for individuals diagnosed with AMH. We assessed logistic regression and compared its performance with machine learning models, including random forests and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). We conducted a retrospective cohort study linking several administrative datasets for 232,253 individuals with Alberta health insurance in Calgary, Canada, who were aged between 18 and 65 and diagnosed with AMH between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018. We assessed outcomes in two years following cohort entry. Individuals with episodes of FHE-H (2,606 individuals) before the index date were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with outcomes by estimating adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Among 229,647 individuals diagnosed with AMH, 1,886 (0.82%) experienced FHE-H during the follow-up period. Mental health emergency visits (AORs=5.28 [95% CI: 4.41, 6.33]), substance misuse (AORs=3.87 [95% CI: 3.28, 4.56], substance use disorders (AORs=2.03 [95% CI: 1.64, 2.50]), and male sex (AORs=1.28 [95% CI: 1.14, 1.44]) were associated with FHE-H. XGBoost performance improved over logistic regression, with increases in area under the curve (AUC) by 1% and precision by 2%. Overall, several AMH features were associated with FHE-H, and machine learning models outperformed logistic regression, although to a small degree.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.