ArticlePloS one2025
The impact of structure adjustment of energy consumption on the structural upgrading of the construction industry.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using spatial Durbin model on panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2008 to 2022, this article explores the technical effect, price effect, and spatial effect of energy consumption structure on the structure of the construction industry. It is found that structure adjustment of energy consumption (SAEC) has a significant promoting effect on structural upgrading of the construction industry (SUC), exhibiting a negative spillover effect in space. Technology spillovers and research and development (R&D) are also the main channels through which SAEC affects SUC, while the channel effect of energy price effect is not significant. Further research has found that reducing the proportion of coal, oil, and natural gas consumption can promote SUC, with natural gas having the strongest effect. At the regional level, SAEC has a stronger promoting effect on SUC in the central and western regions, but its spatial negative spillover effect is more pronounced in the eastern region; On the temporal level, the promotion effect of SAEC on SUC was stronger from 2008 to 2014, while its spatial negative spillover effect was more pronounced from 2015 to 2022. In addition, with the increase in energy prices and human capital levels, it can further stimulate the promoting effect of SAEC on SUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.