ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
STEAM: Spatial Transcriptomics Evaluation Algorithm and Metric for clustering performance.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence in multi-omics: a review of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomic technologies allow researchers to explore the diversity and specificity of gene expression within an original tissue structure. Accurately identifying regions that are spatially coherent in both gene expression and physical tissue structures is an emerging topic; however, it is challenging because of the lack of ground truth labels which complicates the validation of clustering consistency and reproducibility. This highlights a need for a computational evaluation framework to rigorously and unbiasedly assess the clustering performance. To address this gap, we propose Spatial Transcriptomics Evaluation Algorithm and Metric (STEAM), a user-friendly computational pipeline to evaluate the consistency and reliability of clustering results by leveraging machine learning classification and prediction methods, with the goal of maintaining spatial proximity and gene expression patterns within clusters. In addition, it enables iterative correction of misclassified cells, providing actionable guidance for cluster refinement. We benchmarked STEAM on various public datasets, spanning multicell to single-cell resolution, normal and diseased tissues, as well as spatial transcriptomics and proteomics. The results highlighted its robustness and generalizability through comprehensive statistical evaluation metrics, such as Kappa score, F1 score, accuracy, adjusted rand index, normalized mutual information, and percentage of abnormal spots. Notably, STEAM supports multisample training, enabling cross-replicate clustering consistency assessments. Moreover, STEAM provides practical guidance by comparing clustering results across multiple approaches; here, we evaluated four representative methods encompassing both spatial-aware and spatial-ignorant strategies. In summary, STEAM is a promising tool for evaluating clustering robustness and benchmarking clustering performance for spatial omics data, offering valuable insights to drive reproducible discoveries in spatial biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.