ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2025
UltraFlex: Iterative Model-Based Ultrasonic Flexible-Array Shape Calibration.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- High-uniformity miniaturized PMUT array with broadband and high-sensitivity for wearable ultrasound imaging.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
UltraFlex is an iterative model-based ultrasonic flexible-array shape calibration framework that uses automatic differentiation. This work evaluates array shape calibration model performance while examining multiple image quality metrics: speckle brightness, envelope entropy, coherence factor, lag-one coherence, common-midpoint correlation coefficient (CMCC), and common-midpoint phase error (CMPE). The accuracy of these image quality metrics was evaluated on simulated phantoms using a variety of array shapes. Experimental phantom and in vivo liver datasets were also investigated using transducers with known geometries. While speckle brightness, envelope entropy, and coherence factor enable model convergence under many conditions, lag-one coherence, CMCC, and CMPE enable more accurate element position estimations and improved visual ultrasound image focusing quality. Furthermore, the models based on the CMCC and phase-error quality metrics are the most robust against additive white noise while achieving median mean Euclidean errors (MEEs) of 3.7 μm for simulation, 29.7 μm for phantom, and 69.0 μm for in vivo liver data. These array shape calibration results show promise for future development of experimental flexible- and wearableultrasonic arrays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.