Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171565›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Similarities and Differences in Diagnostic Scales.

Bin Xuan, Peng Li, Yuqi Liu, Gang Liu, Yu Chen, Liping Yang, Mingzhu Li, Jing Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bin XuanSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China. xuanbin@ahnu.edu.cn.
Peng LiPeople's Education Press Research Institute, People's Education Press, Beijing, China.
Yuqi LiuMethodology and Statistics Department, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, AK, The Netherlands.
Gang LiuCounseling and Guidance, School of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia.
Yu ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Liping YangSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China.
Mingzhu LiSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China.
Jing ZhouSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scale as a diagnostic tool plays an important role in discriminating between addicts and normal subjects. At the beginning of this chapter, we will briefly introduce the development of substance and non-substance addiction scales, which not only include alcohol addiction, nicotine addiction, cannabis addiction, pathological gambling pathological Internet use, but also exercise addiction, sex addiction, and food addiction, which are in dispute. While we will find almost all the addiction scales contain the items on social impairment, preoccupied, withdrawal, and tolerance, the variability is more pronounced with the non-substance addiction scales than the substance addiction scales. The comparison and the trends of the addiction scales in the future will be discussed on the concept of addiction, the development of assessment theory, the cross-cultural applicability, cross-sample applicability, and the positive side of addiction.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictivePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSubstance-Related DisordersHumansNon-substance addiction scalesReliabilitySubstance addictionValidity

Identifiers

PMID41171565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.