ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Statins in the context of precision cancer medicine: important factors to consider.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic role of statins in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Cholesterol Reprogramming in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Integrating Tumor-Intrinsic Metabolism and Immune Crosstalk.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Statins in Membrane Lipid Therapy: Mechanistic Promise Versus Clinical Reality.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statins, commonly prescribed for hypercholesterolemia, have demonstrated a range of anticancer properties, including the induction of apoptosis and ferroptosis, modulation of autophagy, and reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. These effects position statins as promising candidates for drug repurposing in oncology. However, integrating statins into cancer care will require a precision medicine approach. Despite the increasing volume of preclinical data supporting statin anticancer effects, clinical evaluation remains limited. To date, only a small number of clinical trials have investigated statins in oncology, and these have primarily focused on moderate-intensity regimens. Emerging evidence suggests that certain statins may be more effective than others as anticancer agents, with their therapeutic activity shown to be both dose- and time-dependent. This review highlights key considerations for formulating a precision cancer medicine framework for statins. These include the chemical properties and pharmacokinetics of different statins, interpatient genetic variability affecting statin response, biomarkers of statin sensitivity, the need to achieve therapeutically relevant concentrations in tumor tissue, potential synergies with existing chemotherapeutic agents, and recent advances in targeted statin delivery technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41171484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.