Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171452›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

Laparoscopic mesh removal in inguinal hernia surgery: evaluating patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes.

Emel Özveri, Hakan Gök, Deniz Esin Tekcan Sanli, Metin Ertem

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emel ÖzveriDepartment of Surgery, Acıbadem Hospital, Kozyatağı, Istanbul, Turkey. emel.ozveri@acibadem.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2628-5553
Hakan GökHernia Istanbul, Comprehensive Hernia Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2925-8326
Deniz Esin Tekcan SanliDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6545-5757
Metin ErtemDepartment of Surgery, Acıbadem Hospital, Kozyatağı, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8406-1211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh removal approach for managing chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and recurrent inguinal hernia.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 32 consecutive patients who presented with chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and/or recurrent inguinal hernia between May 2013 and December 2024 following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair performed at external instutions. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation with ultrasound and/or 1.5-Tesla MRI to assess mesh-related complications such as meshoma, migration, or inadequate coverage. 23 patients underwent concurrent laparoscopic hernia repair; redo transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) was performed in 21 and redo totally extraperitoneal (TEP) in 2. In 9 patients, no evidence of hernia was identified intraoperatively during mesh removal; therefore, secondary hernia repair was not undertaken. Pre- and postoperative questionnaires (the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Short Form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (sf-IPQ)) on pain and quality of life (QoL) scores were recorded.

results32 patients (median age 43 years; 84% male) underwent laparoscopic mesh removal, with a total of 41 meshes explanted. Bilateral mesh removal was performed in 28% of cases, and simultaneous laparoscopic hernia repair was carried out in 72% of patients. The median operative time was 123 min, and no conversions to open surgery occured. Intraoperative complications were observed in 19% of patient, including inferior epigastric artery injury (9%), vas deference injury /6%), and bladder injury (3%). Postoperative complications were minimal (13%) and included testicular tenderness, seroma, surgical site infection, and one recurrence. At a median follow-up of 8.5 months (2-139 months), 59% of patients reported complete pain relief and 34% partial improvement, with significant reductions in both Sf-IPQ and BPI scores (p < 0.001).

conclusionsLaparoscopic preperitoneal mesh removal was associated with high rates of technical success and acceptable safety profile; however, due to its technical complexity, the procedure should be limited to experienced surgeons in specialized centers. Patient satisfaction and quality-of-life scores showed significant improvement following the intervention. Laparoscopic mesh removal represents a feasible option for the management of chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and/or recurrent inguinal hernias, and successful treatment of CPIP can result in substantial enhancement of patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Device RemovalHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainSurgical MeshAdultAgedChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRecurrenceChronic inguinal painHerniorrhaphyInguinal herniaLaparoscopyMesh removal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.