Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171440›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Governance and policy in global neurosurgery: a scoping review of national and international efforts.

Ellianne Dos Santos Rubio, Khalil St Brice, Felix Toussaint, Jimena Colado-Martinez, Garrett W Thrash, Ali Azan Ahmed, James Kelbert, Walt Johnson

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ellianne Dos Santos RubioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao, Curaçao.
Khalil St BriceUniversity of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Felix ToussaintAmerican University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten.
Jimena Colado-MartinezEpilepsy Clinic, Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, México City, México.
Garrett W ThrashUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA. gthrash@uab.edu.
Ali Azan AhmedMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
James KelbertDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Walt JohnsonProgram of Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Governmental organizations play a key role in making Global Neurosurgery timely, safe, and accessible. They are essential in decreasing disparity and improving outcomes through informing policy, funding, and resource allocation. The Boston Declaration aims to promote collaboration between high-income and low- and middle-income countries in addressing these challenges and realizing more equitable access to neurosurgical care worldwide. To identify and map key governmental stakeholders in Global Neurosurgery, emphasizing their roles in policy development, funding, resource allocation, research support, capacity building, advocacy, and international cooperation in addressing unmet neurosurgical needs. We employed a mixed-methods approach, analyzing the roles of governmental organizations in neurosurgery. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Global Index Medicus. Sources included Ministries of Health and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) websites, annual reports, social media, and world health organisation (WHO) documents. Inclusion criteria covered governmental organizations and health policy institutions; non-governmental organizations and those without documented impact were excluded. WHO was the most frequently cited organization (25%) guiding global neurosurgical policy. National Ministries of Health (23%) were pivotal in developing policy based on country-specific needs. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were cited in 18%, reflecting their funding role in the U.S., while military health systems (7%) were accountable for trauma care. International partnerships, though less frequent (5%), played vital roles in improving access in low-resource settings. Government agencies like the WHO, Ministries of Health, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) advance Global Neurosurgery via policy, financing, and service provision. This underscores the urgent need for sustained collaboration, implementation teams, and accountability to achieve long-term equity.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth PolicyNeurosurgeryHumansInternational CooperationNeurosurgical ProceduresGlobal healthGlobal neurosurgeryGovernmental organizationsHealth equity

Identifiers

PMID41171440
PMCPMC12578682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.