ReviewWorld journal of urology2025
Imaging during pediatric stone management and follow up.
Review in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe rising incidence of pediatric urolithiasis, especially in adolescents, underscores the need for optimized imaging strategies in diagnosis, management, and follow-up. This study aims to review the current imaging modalities used in pediatric stone disease, evaluate their efficacy, safety, and radiation risks, and explore strategies for reducing radiation exposure while ensuring effective clinical outcomes.
methodsThis narrative review synthesizes existing literature and clinical studies on imaging modalities, the use of radiological imaging during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), with a focus on radiation safety and adherence to the “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA) principles. Data on radiation exposure, stone-free rates, and complication rates related to ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided approaches were reported and discussed.
resultsUltrasound-guided SWL, URS, and PCNL demonstrated comparable efficacy to fluoroscopy-guided techniques, with stone-free rates ranging from 82% to 96%, and significantly reduced radiation exposure. Introduction of radiation-reducing protocols, such as pre-fluoroscopy checklists and dose optimization techniques, led to up to 88% reduction in radiation dose during endourological procedures. Furthermore, metabolic evaluation and tailored preventive strategies were shown to lower recurrence rates, minimizing the need for repeated imaging.
conclusionImaging in pediatric urolithiasis must balance diagnostic efficacy with long-term safety. Ultrasound-guided interventions and radiation-reducing strategies effectively minimize radiation risk without compromising clinical outcomes. Comprehensive metabolic management further supports reduced imaging frequency. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to optimize pediatric stone care while adhering to radiation safety principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41171412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.