Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171315›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2025

Stone extraction during flexible ureterorenoscopy with or without the hydrogel method: a randomized, multicenter safety and feasibility study.

T Amiel, A Neisius, C Netsch, A Secker, C Fisang, I Grunwald, L Lunger, M Straub

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T AmielDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany. Thomas.amiel@tum.de.
A NeisiusDepartment of Urology, Clinic Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.
C NetschDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
A SeckerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
C FisangDepartment of Urology, Marienhaus Klinikum, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany.
I GrunwaldDepartment of Industrial and Environmental Biology, Hochschule Bremen, City University of Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany.
L Lunger *Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
M Straub *Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAchieving the highest possible stone-free rate is the primary goal of kidney stone surgery, yet standard flexible ureterorenoscopy often leaves small residual fragments that predispose to recurrence. The hydrogel method using mediNiK MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective, randomized, multicenter proof-of-concept trial included patients > 18 years with kidney stones > 8 mm and no anatomical abnormalities. Patients were randomized to flexible ureterorenoscopy + hydrogel (Group 1) or flexible ureterorenoscopy (Group 2) alone. After laser lithotripsy, fragments were retrieved either embedded in hydrogel or individually, and categorized by size (< 0.5 mm, 0.5-1.0 mm, > 1.0 mm). Explorative statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Student's t-test, and Chi-square test. Adverse events were monitored intraoperatively and during a 6-week follow-up.

resultsOf 65 screened patients, 40 were analysed (Group 1: n = 23; Group 2: n = 17). The hydrogel method significantly retrieved more fragments < 1 mm (1716 vs. 209) and > 1 mm (310 vs. 118). On a per-patient level, more < 1 mm fragments were removed in Group 1 (median 7 [IQR 21] vs. 0 [2], p < 0.003). Surgery duration was longer in Group 1 (80 [28] vs. 62 [20] minutes, p = 0.02). No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThe hydrogel method was a safe and feasible addition to fURS, allowing improved retrieval of even the smallest fragments without added risk. The main limitations are the small sample size and absence of long-term stone-free and recurrence data, underscoring the need for larger confirmatory studies.

Indexed as

HydrogelsKidney CalculiUreteroscopyAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProof of Concept StudyProspective StudiesUreteroscopesHydrogelsFlexible ureterenoscopyHydrogel methodStone dustingStone free rateUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41171315
PMCPMC12578769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.