Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171272›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Academic General and Subspecialty Pediatric Promotion Timelines and Lifetime Earnings.

Lubaina Ehsan, Murad Almasri, Krittika Joshi, Bilal Celik, Ye Hong, Joshua Daily

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lubaina EhsanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock.
Murad AlmasriDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock.
Krittika JoshiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock.
Bilal CelikDepartment of Economics, Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Ye HongDepartment of Economics, Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Joshua DailyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Differences in academic promotion timelines may contribute to long-standing disparities in pediatric physician compensation and impact workforce sustainability. Objective: To evaluate the association between promotion timing and the net present value (NPV) of lifetime earnings for academic general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists across salary percentiles and career lengths. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study using a financial modeling strategy examined 2024-2025 compensation data from the Association of Administrators in Academic Pediatrics. The NPV analysis was conducted for 29 pediatric fields across 4 promotion scenarios (early promotion, baseline promotion, stalled promotion, and no promotion), 3 salary percentiles (25th, 50th, and 75th), and 3 career lengths (standard, part time, and early retirement). Exposure: Promotion timeline and pediatric subspecialty. Main Outcome and Measures: The outcome was NPV of lifetime earnings as measured in constant 2025 dollars. Results: A total of 19 111 academic pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists were included from the compensation dataset. Early promotion consistently yielded the highest NPV across all subspecialties and salary percentiles (median NPV, $7 621 223.50), while remaining at the assistant professor rank for an entire career was associated with the lowest NPV (median, $6 967 428.72). Baseline promotion NPV peaked at a mean (SD) of $9 364 986.25 ($695 347.50), while no promotion NPV was significantly lower (mean [SD], $7 093 248.02 [$475 237.71]). Stalled promotion reduced the median NPV by $500 000 to $1.5 million; no promotion led to losses exceeding $2 million to $3 million in high-paying subspecialties, such as cardiology, critical care, and neonatology. Sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations found that delayed promotion was negatively associated with lifetime earnings under all tested scenarios. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of academic pediatricians, promotion timing was associated with lifetime earnings and often more influential than subspecialty or salary percentile. The findings suggest that physicians who were never promoted may need to work an additional 10 years to match the earnings of peers promoted via a baseline promotion trajectory. The findings highlight the financial consequences of delayed advancement and underscore the need for institutional efforts to support timely and equitable promotion across the pediatric workforce.

Indexed as

Career MobilityIncomePediatriciansPediatricsSalaries and Fringe BenefitsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41171272
PMCPMC12579352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.