ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Molecular Mechanisms Explaining Neuroanatomical Subtypes in Major Depressive Disorder: Insights From Cortical Morphometric Inverse Divergence.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connectomic signatures advance the understandings of transdiagnostic heterogeneity in psychosis.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Morphometric Inverse Divergence Networks Combined with HYDRA Identify Parkinson's Disease Subtypes with Distinct Transcriptomic and Serum Biomarker Profiles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The genetic architecture of cortical similarity networks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Explaining Neuroanatomical Subtypes in Major Depressive Disorder: Insights From Cortical Morphometric Inverse Divergence.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Investigation of cerebral cortical morphological similarity and network topological abnormalities in hepatic encephalopathy utilizing a morphometric inverse divergence network framework.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) exhibits substantial neurobiological heterogeneity that complicates treatment selection and mechanistic understanding. While conventional group-level analyses identify diverse structural alterations, they obscure clinically relevant individual differences. We employed heterogeneity through discriminant analysis (HYDRA) clustering to decompose morphometric inverse divergence (MIND) network patterns into distinct neuroanatomical subtypes and examined their molecular underpinnings. We analyzed MIND network data from 240 Japanese individuals with MDD and 367 healthy controls using unsupervised clustering. Subtype-specific alterations were mapped onto neurotransmitter receptor density distributions, and transcriptomic data from the Allen Human Brain Atlas were integrated using partial least squares regression. Two neuroanatomically distinct subtypes emerged. Subtype 1 (n = 78) exhibited widespread increases in MIND strength across all Yeo networks, with predominant serotonergic, dopaminergic, and GABAergic associations. Gene expression analysis revealed SST and CUX2 correlations, with enrichment for metal ion homeostasis and circadian rhythm pathways. Subtype 2 (n = 162) showed reduced MIND strength in dorsal attention, somatomotor, frontoparietal, limbic, and default networks, with glutamatergic, cannabinoid, and dopaminergic dysfunction. This subtype demonstrated negative CRH correlations and enrichment for glutamatergic signaling and calcium/cAMP-mediated processes. Our findings demonstrate systematic decomposition of MDD heterogeneity into distinct neuroanatomical subtypes with unique molecular signatures. The identification of subtype-specific neurotransmitter profiles and transcriptomic architectures provides mechanistic insights into MDD heterogeneity, offering potential for biomarker-guided treatment selection and personalized therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.