Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41171139›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.

U M Stoof, K J Friston, M Tisdall, G K Cooray, R E Rosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

U M StoofWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-7735-5181
K J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909
M TisdallDevelopmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
G K CoorayDevelopmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
R E RoschWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Anna Mueller Grocholski FoundationHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeOakgrove FoundationSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada ES/T01279X/1UK National Institute of Health ResearchWellcome 205103/Z/16/ZWellcome 209164/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain function and its failures arise from dynamical patterns of neuronal activity shaped by synaptic neurotransmission. Both neurotransmitter receptor expression and neuronal population dynamics show a remarkable regional variability across the human cortex. We leverage this functional specialisation to characterise the relationship between receptor architectonics and electrophysiological signals. Using dynamic causal modelling (DCM), we fitted neural mass models to a normative set of intracranial EEG data. Subsequently, Bayesian model comparison helped to evaluate whether models improved when equipped with constraints on synaptic connectivity, based on regional neurotransmitter receptor densities. The results show that dynamic causal models generated region-specific intracranial EEG spectra accurately. Incorporating prior information on normative receptor distributions further improved model evidence, indicating that regional variation in receptor density explains variations in synaptic connectivity and ensuing cortical population dynamics. The output is a cortical atlas of neurobiologically informed intracortical synaptic connectivity parameters. These can serve as empirical priors in future, patient-specific models. In summary, we show that molecular cortical characteristics-that is, receptor densities-enrich and inform generative, biophysically plausible models of coupled neuronal populations. This work helps to explain regional variations in human electrophysiology, provides a methodological foundation to integrate multimodal data, and serves as a normative resource for future DCM studies of electrophysiology.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElectrocorticographyModels, NeurologicalReceptors, NeurotransmitterAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultReceptors, Neurotransmittercanonical microcircuitcomputational neurosciencedynamic causal modellingmultimodal modelneural mass modelneurotransmitter

Identifiers

PMID41171139
PMCPMC12576962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.