ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking human brain functional connectivity to underlying neurotransmission.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Synaptic Tuning of Brain Rhythms: From Chemical Signalling to Cortical Oscillations.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain function and its failures arise from dynamical patterns of neuronal activity shaped by synaptic neurotransmission. Both neurotransmitter receptor expression and neuronal population dynamics show a remarkable regional variability across the human cortex. We leverage this functional specialisation to characterise the relationship between receptor architectonics and electrophysiological signals. Using dynamic causal modelling (DCM), we fitted neural mass models to a normative set of intracranial EEG data. Subsequently, Bayesian model comparison helped to evaluate whether models improved when equipped with constraints on synaptic connectivity, based on regional neurotransmitter receptor densities. The results show that dynamic causal models generated region-specific intracranial EEG spectra accurately. Incorporating prior information on normative receptor distributions further improved model evidence, indicating that regional variation in receptor density explains variations in synaptic connectivity and ensuing cortical population dynamics. The output is a cortical atlas of neurobiologically informed intracortical synaptic connectivity parameters. These can serve as empirical priors in future, patient-specific models. In summary, we show that molecular cortical characteristics-that is, receptor densities-enrich and inform generative, biophysically plausible models of coupled neuronal populations. This work helps to explain regional variations in human electrophysiology, provides a methodological foundation to integrate multimodal data, and serves as a normative resource for future DCM studies of electrophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.