ArticleBlood advances2026
A retrospective study of treatment and outcomes in synchronous systemic and central nervous system large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractSynchronous systemic and de novo secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is an aggressive clinical entity with a historically poor prognosis. Given the rarity of this presentation, prospective studies are limited, and treatment paradigms and outcomes are extrapolated from small, heterogenous retrospective studies. We performed a retrospective study with extended follow-up for 63 consecutive patients with previously untreated synchronous systemic and de novo secondary CNS LBCLs presenting to 2 institutions over 21 years. Most patients had diffuse LBCL (73%) and were treated with an average of 6 cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, Oncovin [vincristine], and prednisone) intercalated with high-dose IV methotrexate (R-CHOP-M). The overall response rate was 84% (75% complete). With a median follow-up of 8.1 years, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.2 years, and the 6-year PFS rate was 37%. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.9 years, and the 6-year OS rate was 52%. Normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, and brain parenchymal-only CNS disease were associated with improved PFS, whereas normal LDH and parenchymal disease were associated with OS. The 25% of patients who underwent consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) had superior PFS and OS than patients who did not receive a transplant, with particular benefit in those with IPI score of ≥3. This study demonstrates that a proportion of patients presenting with secondary CNS involvement are cured with upfront chemoimmunotherapy with or without HDC/ASCT and helps identify prognostically favorable subgroups, which can guide counseling of patients with this rare, high-risk clinical presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.