ArticleBlood advances2026
Retreatment with R-CHOP-like therapy in patients with late relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasmablastic lymphoma through clonal expansion 17 years after EBV-positive DLBCL: case report and review.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPatients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with late relapse (>2 years from diagnosis) may be treated with a second course of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-like therapy particularly if comorbidities preclude more intensive options. Patients with de novo DLBCL initially treated with an R-CHOP-like regimen who later developed late relapse and were re-treated with curative-intent R-CHOP-like therapy were identified using the BC Cancer databases. Sixty-five patients were identified; at relapse, the median age was 77 years (range, 52-89), 81% had stage III to IV DLBCL, 52% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 to 4, and 78% had an International Prognostic Index score of 3 to 5. The median time from original diagnosis was 7.4 years (range, 2.5-15.9). Median number of cycles of R-CHOP-like therapy received at relapse was 5 (range, 1-6). Overall response rate was 72%, and 57% complete response. With a median follow-up of 31 months, 2-year time to progression (TTP) was 54%, 2-year progression-free survival was 46%, 2-year disease-specific survival was 64%, and 2-year overall survival was 54%. Patients relapsing >5 years from diagnosis had better TTP, with a 2-year TTP of 66% compared with 9% for patients relapsing between 2 and 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.64; P = .001). Many patients with late-relapsing DLBCL may be effectively treated with further R-CHOP-like therapy, avoiding more intensive and costly secondary therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.