ArticleMolecular medicine reports2026
[Corrigendum] Early anticoagulation therapy for severe burns complicated by inhalation injury in a rabbit model.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that, regarding the histological images shown in Fig. 1 on p. 7377, the 'Sham' and the 'Model' data panels appeared to show areas of overlapping data with the 'Union' and the 'Antithrombin' panels respectively, albeit with very different zoom factors, such that data which were intended to show the results from differently performed experiments had apparently been derived from the same original sources. The authors were contacted by the Editorial Office to offer an explanation for these apparent anomalies in the presentation of the data in this paper, although, due to the time that had elapsed since our contacting them, an Expression of Concern (doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2025.13691) was issued as the Editorial Office continued to investigate this matter further. However, the authors, who still had access to their original data, have now responded to the query, and realize that the figure was inadvertently assembled incorrectly. The revised version of Fig. 1, now showing the correct data panels for the 'Sham', 'Antithrombin' and 'Union' panels, is shown below. Note that these errors did not significantly affect either the results or the overall conclusions reported in this study. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.