ReviewTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Screening and impact of comorbidities in bronchiectasis: a forward-looking perspective.
Review in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision treatment of COPD based on novel imaging phenotypes: a treatable traits approach.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- The importance of symptoms in bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Bone health in asthma: a twofold effect of disease and pharmacotherapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Rehabilitation interventions in bronchiectasis: expanding evidence, personalization, and clinical practice.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Small airway dysfunction in bronchiectasis patients with exercise-induced desaturation.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
- Nutritional management in bronchiectasis: A practical guide for clinicians.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is a chronic, complex, and heterogeneous respiratory disease characterized by irreversible bronchial dilation, persistent airway inflammation, and recurrent infections. Traditionally viewed from a lung-centered perspective, its pathophysiology has been explained by the "vicious cycle" hypothesis, later refined into the more dynamic concept of the "vicious vortex." However, emerging evidence highlights the pivotal role of comorbidities in influencing disease progression, symptom burden, and prognosis. This review explores the evolving understanding of bronchiectasis by integrating comorbidities into current pathophysiological frameworks. We illustrate how coexisting conditions interact with components of the vicious vortex, amplifying airway inflammation, impairing host defenses, and disrupting clearance mechanisms. We summarize evidence on the prevalence, clinical impact, and prognostic significance of key comorbidities and discuss their implications for patient management. Finally, we emphasize the importance of an integrated, multidisciplinary approach and the emerging role of the treatable traits framework, which focuses on identifying clinically relevant, biologically measurable, and modifiable traits-regardless of whether they are etiological or nonetiological. In this sense, we propose a conceptual "Copernican Revolution" in bronchiectasis care: recognizing comorbidities not as secondary features, but as potential drivers of disease trajectory. By adopting this pragmatic strategy, clinicians can optimize quality of life, achieve patient-centered care, and improve outcomes in this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.