ArticleGigaScience2025
Quantitative detection of DNA methylation from nanopore sequencing data without raw signals.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative detection of DNA methylation from nanopore sequencing data without raw signals.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNanopore sequencing has revolutionized the field of epigenomics by enabling direct detection of DNA methylation without additional sample preprocessing such as bisulfite treatment. It is theoretically possible to reutilize any nanopore sequencing data to construct epigenomes. However, reutilizing the data in practice is challenging with existing methods because they rely on raw signals from nanopore sequencing, which are absent in more than 98% of public nanopore sequencing data. Moreover, storing raw signals for large-scale sequencing projects is impractical due to their enormous file sizes.
findingsTo overcome these limitations, we propose a novel method, NanoFreeLunch, which can quantitatively detect DNA methylation without the need for raw signals by modeling base quality values and sequencing error patterns. Our results demonstrated a strong correlation between the DNA methylation levels estimated by NanoFreeLunch and those estimated by the benchmark methods, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 for individual genomic loci and from 0.97 to 0.99 for average methylation levels of genomic regions.
conclusionsNanoFreeLunch enables detection of DNA methylation from nanopore sequencing data without raw signals. With the rapid accumulation of nanopore sequencing data, the development of NanoFreeLunch will enable the construction of epigenomes on an unprecedented scale, facilitating novel insights into the role of DNA methylation in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.