ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Preoperative predictors of mortality in intestinal perforation.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bowel perforation represents a prevalent and life-threatening emergency within general surgical pathology. This study aims to evaluate clinical and biochemical parameters that predict mortality in cases of bowel perforation. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients who underwent surgical intervention for bowel perforation between 2019 and 2024. Key variables assessed included the albumin/creatinine ratio, age, serum albumin levels, CRP, and history of COVID-19. Mortality-associated variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The mean age of the patients was 60 years, with 84 patients (58.3%) being male. The overall mortality rate was 25%. Independent predictors of mortality identified in the study included an albumin/creatinine ratio <3.38 (odds ratio [OR]: 12.666, p<0.001), age >66 years (OR: 3.273, p=0.036), and serum albumin levels <3 g/dL (OR: 5.653, p=0.002). ROC analysis indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) for the albumin/creatinine ratio was 0.879, establishing it as the parameter with the highest predictive accuracy for mortality. Among patients with a history of COVID-19, ischemia was the predominant cause of perforation (87.5%), while malignancy was the leading cause (41.4%) in those without a COVID-19 history. This difference in etiology was statistically significant (p<0.001). In conclusion, the albumin/creatinine ratio, age, and serum albumin levels are robust parameters for predicting mortality in bowel perforation cases. Furthermore, a history of COVID-19 significantly increases the risk of bowel perforation due to ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.