ArticleBiotechnology progress
Optimizing sterile filtration of nanoemulsions through proper choice of prefilter properties.
Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulating Membrane Surface Properties via Prewetting With Polysorbate 20 to Improve Sterile Filtration of Nanoemulsions.Biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Optimizing sterile filtration of nanoemulsions through proper choice of prefilter properties.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoemulsions, with droplet sizes between 20 and 200 nm, have emerged as a promising vaccine adjuvant and drug delivery system, enhancing the solubility of hydrophobic drugs for diverse applications. Sterile filtration of nanoemulsions is particularly challenging due to the similar size between the nanodroplets and the 0.2 μm nominal pore size rating of sterile filters. One approach to reducing membrane fouling, and enhancing filtration capacity and yield, is to employ an appropriate prefilter, but there are currently no clear guidelines on how to select the prefilter pore size, chemistry, or morphology for sterile filtration of nanoemulsions. This study examined the performance of a range of prefilters with varying pore morphologies and surface chemistries. Sessile drop contact angles were used to evaluate the prefilter hydrophobicity, and bubble point and mercury intrusion porosimetry were used to evaluate the pore characteristics of the different prefilters. The best performance was achieved using a relatively hydrophobic 0.45 μm prefilter made of polyvinylidene fluoride but modified with a somewhat hydrophilic (oxygen-containing) coating. This prefilter reduced the surface tension of the nanoemulsion and provided more than a 2-fold increase in capacity for a variety of sterile filters. These results provide critical insights into the factors influencing nanoemulsion filtration and offer a framework for selection of appropriate prefilters in biopharmaceutical manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.