ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Videos on YouTube, Bilibili, TikTok as sources of medical information on Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Endocrinologists Should Know About Iodine: Population Deficiency, Individual Excess and Misinformation in the United Kingdom.Clinical endocrinology · 2026Review
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of rotator cuff injury related videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the reliability and quality of lupus nephritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of osteoporosis-related health information on short-video platforms: a multi-source cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality of Allergic Rhinitis Content Across Social Media Platforms.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of pediatric inguinal hernia treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality and reliability of sarcopenia-related videos on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality evaluation of health science popularization short videos related to cerebrovascular diseases on popular short video platforms in China: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating TikTok and YouTube as patient-education resources on kidney transplantation: a comparative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality and Reliability of Social Media Videos on Weight-Loss Interventions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Multi-Platform Cross-Sectional Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessing the content and quality of gout-related videos on video platforms: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), a common autoimmune thyroid disorder, is widely discussed on video-sharing platforms. However, user-generated content about HT lacks systematic scientific validation. This study evaluates the reliability and quality of HT-related videos on three major social media platforms: YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok. Methods: Between December 1, 10, 2024, the top 200 videos meeting the criteria retrieved under default search settings using a newly registered user account were included for each platform. These videos were from 107 YouTube accounts, 56 Bilibili accounts and 90 TikTok accounts. Metrics including video parameters and creator profiles were recorded. Content quality was evaluated using five validated assessment tools: PEMAT (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool), VIQI (Video Information and Quality Index), GQS (Global Quality Score), mDISCERN (modified DISCERN), and JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) standards. Results: TikTok videos showed the highest audience engagement. YouTube had more team-based accounts (43.9%), while TikTok and Bilibili predominantly featured individual accounts, with TikTok featuring a notably higher proportion of verified individual accounts (86.7%). Solo narration was the most common video style across YouTube (62.5%) and TikTok (70.0%), while in Bilibili, it was the medical scenario. In contrast, YouTube and Bilibili offered a broader range of content, including TV programs, documentaries, and educational courses. The varying emphases of different assessment tools rendered it difficult to determine which platform boasts the highest content quality, but the video quality scores across all platforms are not satisfying. Additionally, we found that content produced by verified creators was of higher quality compared to that of unverified creators, with this trend being particularly evident among individual accounts. Conclusion: Social media platforms provide partial support for the dissemination of health information about HT, but the overall video quality remains suboptimal. We recommend that professional creators pursue platform certification to enhance the dissemination of high-quality HT-related videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.