ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Balancing oncological control and immune preservation in the immunotherapy era: revisiting lymph node dissection in non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The extent of lymph node dissection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: current controversies, evidence gaps, and future directions in the immunotherapy era-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Risk-adapted nodal evaluation in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based competing-risk analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) has long been widely accepted and established as a standard surgical procedure for lung cancer. In recent years, with the increased detection rate of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the advancement of minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery concepts, approaches to lymph node dissection have undergone a notable shift. Previous studies have indicated that extensive removal of non-metastatic lymph nodes may offer uncertain clinical benefits. As a result, alternative strategies such as lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) and lymph node sampling have gained attention among thoracic surgeons. In recent years, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC has achieved remarkable success, with tumor-draining lymph nodes (TdLNs) playing a pivotal role in the efficacy of immunotherapy. Lymph node preservation strategies may synergize with immunotherapy by maintaining systemic immune surveillance. Conversely, the removal of non-metastatic lymph nodes could disrupt systemic immunity and exert secondary effects on primary tumors or potential micrometastases. This review summarizes the evolution of lymph node dissection strategies in lung cancer surgery and, in the context of encouraging outcomes with immunotherapy, provides new perspectives on future directions for balancing oncological control with immune preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.