Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170441›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

Taylor Swift versus Mozart: music preferences of C57BL/6J mice.

Dominik Kamionek, Johann G Maass, Claudia Pitzer, Christian P Schaaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominik Kamionek *Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johann G Maass *Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudia PitzerInterdisciplinary Neurobehavioral Core, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian P SchaafInstitute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Music has become an established complementary element of modern medicine, demonstrating beneficial effects towards various diseases such as dementia, hypertension, or chronic pain. Given its low cost and non-invasive nature, music-based interventions have been studied in both healthy mice and disease models over recent decades to examine potential effects in rodents. However, the selection of music in these interventions is based on prior reports and human preferences, without critically evaluating its relevance or perception in mice. Novel experimental approaches are needed to evaluate which type of music is preferred by mice. Methods: In this pilot study, we introduce a new experimental setup that can be used to analyze the music preferences regarding different genres and frequencies. Here, we present the first-ever evaluation of mouse music preferences by examining the behavioral responses of healthy C57BL/6J. Results: When given a choice between different musical conditions, mice spent comparatively less time in a chamber playing Discussion: These findings underscore the importance of species-specific tailoring of music selection towards therapeutic approaches. Our assay can be used to further broaden our understanding of murine music preferences and to analyze how mice respond to and perceive different auditory stimuli. Further studies are needed to systematically investigate murine music perception and preference across genres and exposure durations.

Indexed as

C57BL/6Jenvironmental enrichmentmouse behaviormusicmusic interventionmusic preference

Identifiers

PMID41170441
PMCPMC12568665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.