Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170405›Full record

ArticleMachine Learning. Health2025

Quantitative benchmarking of anomaly detection methods in digital pathology images.

Can Cui, Xindong Zheng, Ruining Deng, Quan Liu, Tianyuan Yao, Keith T Wilson, Lori A Coburn, Bennett A Landman, Haichun Yang, Yaohong Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine Learning. Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Can CuiDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2159-5387
Xindong ZhengDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-0853
Ruining DengDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Quan LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Tianyuan YaoDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Keith T WilsonDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Lori A CoburnDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Haichun YangDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Yaohong WangDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Yuankai HuoDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.

Funding

Spermidine as a New Therapy for Colitis and Chemopreventive for Colitis-associated CarcinogenesisR01DK128200 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILSON, KEITH T. · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
CSRD VA I01 CX002171CSRD VA I01 CX002473NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomaly detection has been widely studied in the context of industrial defect inspection, with numerous methods developed to tackle a range of challenges. In digital pathology, anomaly detection holds significant potential for applications such as rare disease identification, artifact detection, and biomarker discovery. However, the unique characteristics of pathology images-such as large size, multi-scale structures, stain variability, and repetitive patterns-pose new challenges that current anomaly detection algorithms struggle to overcome. In this quantitative study, we benchmark 23 classical anomaly detection methods through extensive experiments. We systematically evaluate these approaches using five digital pathology datasets, including both real and synthetic cases. Our experiments investigate the influence of image scale, anomaly pattern types, and training epoch selection strategies on detection performance. The results provide a detailed comparison of each method's strengths and limitations, establishing a comprehensive benchmark to inform future research in anomaly detection for digital pathology. In addition, we review the current applications of anomaly detection algorithms in the field of pathology images. The code and simulation data will be publicly available at https://github.com/hrlblab/PathAnomalyDetect.

Indexed as

anomaly detectiondigital pathologymedical images

Identifiers

PMID41170405
PMCPMC12569974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.