ReviewStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2025
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Treating Native Aortic Regurgitation: Ready for Prime Time?
Review in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Failed Homograft.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Untreated clinically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) is frequently seen in the general population and is associated with worse outcomes, including higher mortality. Surgical aortic valve replacement is currently the treatment of choice for severe AR. However, a significant proportion of these patients are not good surgical candidates due to advanced age, frailty, and underlying comorbidities, prompting the need for transcatheter options. Current guidelines do not recommend transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe AR with commercially available transcatheter heart valves (THVs). Off-label use of commercial TAVR devices has been associated with lower procedural success, increased complications, mainly valve embolization and residual AR, and poor clinical outcomes. The suboptimal results of TAVR with the current generation THVs are attributed to anatomical factors such as a lack of annular calcium, a large aortic annulus, and a dilated aortic root, posing challenges for device anchoring. TAVR with dedicated devices for AR, such as the JenaValve and the J-Valve, is rapidly evolving, with preliminary evidence suggesting higher procedural success rates and improved clinical outcomes during short-term follow-up. There is a significant unmet need for the development of transcatheter therapies with dedicated THVs for severe AR, and both the JenaValve and J-Valve systems are undergoing rigorous clinical trial testing before regulatory approval in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.