ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Targeting MDM2, RAS, and PCNA for cancer targeted therapy: pan-cancer approaches vs. cancer-specific strategies.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting PCNA in Cancer: A Paradigm Shift from Static Inhibition to Dynamic Network Modulation.Oncology research · 2026Review
- The PCNA inhibitor AOH1996 impairs tumor growth and invasiveness in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer therapy and cancer drug discovery and development have been historically focused on specific cancers (tissue/organ of origin). However, with advances in molecular biology and multi-omics of cancer, there is a trend to develop pan-cancer therapeutic modalities. In targeted therapy, pan-cancer strategies target common molecular alterations across different cancer types and specific cancer strategies are tailored to the unique biological characteristics of individual tumor types. Each approach offers distinct advantages and limitations, and understanding these differences is critical in the era of precision oncology. Targeting key molecular drivers in cancer has significantly changed drug development, allowing for broad-spectrum therapeutic strategies that address shared oncogenic pathways across various tumor types. Among these drivers, RAS, PCNA, and MDM2 have become critical targets due to their roles in a broad-spectrum of cancer biology, e.g., cell proliferation, survival, and genomic stability. Advances in molecularly guided therapies have led to promising approaches for disrupting these pathways, offering new opportunities for cancer treatment. Despite significant progress in the past, challenges such as drug resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and toxicity remain obstacles to widespread clinical success. This review explores the historical development, current advancements, and future directions of RAS, PCNA, and MDM2-targeted therapies, emphasizing their potential to reshape cancer treatment through pan-cancer approaches using biomarker-driven technologies, combination strategies, and next-generation inhibitors. These advancements pave the way for more effective and durable therapies across a wide range of malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.