ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Development and preliminary mechanistic analysis of compound effervescent hepatoprotective granules.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The causes of acute liver injury (ALI) are complex and diverse, including alcohol, drugs, infections, and toxic substances, and it has become a major global health issue. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), with advantages such as broad-spectrum biological activity, low toxicity, and minimal side effects, has been widely used in drug research and development as well as disease management. Some TCMs have shown significant efficacy in treating ALI: Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides, monoterpene glycosides from Paeonia lactiflora, glycyrrhizic acid saponins, and flavonoids all exhibit liver-protective effects; however, the protective effects of their compound preparations on liver injury remain unclear. Methods: The study optimized the water extraction process using orthogonal experiments with AHP-entropy weight scoring. The preparation process was verified by single-factor experiments, Plackeett-Burman and Box-Bohnken tests. The mechanism of action was validated using network pharmacology methods and a CCl4-induced acute liver injury animal model. Results: The developed extraction and granule formation processes were reliable after validation. The contents of active components in CEHG determined by HPLC were as follows: albiflorin 1.26%, paeoniflorin 5.42%, liquiritin 0.43%, glycyrrhizic acid 1.30%, and ganoderic acid A 0.14%, with batch-to-batch variation coefficients (RSD) of 1.66%, 0.87%, 2.32%, 1.60%, and 4.03%, respectively. The dry extract ratio was 18.23% with an RSD of 2.11%. Network pharmacology revealed that CEHG improved liver injury by regulating the HIF-1, p53, and FoxO signaling pathways. Animal experiments indicated that CEHG granules reduce liver function-related aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), total bilirubin (TBIL), and LDH levels, decrease the levels of inflammatory factors IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α and of oxidative stress-related MDA and ROS, and down-regulated the mRNA and protein levels of P53, Bax, and HIF-1α in rats with liver injury. Meanwhile, CEHG improved liver function-related Total Protein (TP), raised the levels of oxidative stress-related SOD, GSH-Px, and GSH, and up-regulated mRNA and protein expression of Bcl-2. Conclusion: This study successfully optimized the extraction and granule-formation of CEHG and revealed its hepatoprotective mechanism through network pharmacology and animal studies, providing scientific evidence supporting the further development and clinical use of CEHG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.