Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Diet quality and environmental impact of university students' food choices at a South African university.

Sanrika Sahadeo, Ashika Naicker, Onwaba Makanjana, Oluwasiji O Olaitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanrika SahadeoDepartment of Food and Nutrition Consumer Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
Ashika NaickerDepartment of Food and Nutrition Consumer Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
Onwaba MakanjanaDepartment of Food and Nutrition Consumer Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
Oluwasiji O OlaitanDepartment of Food and Nutrition Consumer Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: South Africa faces a triple burden of malnutrition. The country's food system, characterized by high consumption of resource-intensive animal and processed foods, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Global policy frameworks increasingly emphasize sustainable diets, but national strategies and implementation efforts in South Africa are still emerging. The climate emergency has amplified global efforts to promote sustainability, yet the environmental impact of dietary choices remains underexplored in South Africa. This study examines diet quality and the environmental impact of food choices of students in a South African university, offering insights into sustainability from a young consumer perspective. Methods: Dietary data were collected using a repeated 24-h food recall method over two non-consecutive days, including a weekend day, for 400 students. Nutrient adequacy was assessed using the cut-off points of recommended daily allowance (RDA) and adequate intake, while diet quality and non-communicable disease (NCD) risk were evaluated using the Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS). The environmental impact of students' diets was estimated using the Plate Up for the Planet carbon footprint calculator. Results: Male students exceeded carbohydrate (310.8 g) and protein (88.06 g) requirements but had notable micronutrient deficiencies, including calcium (74.3% prevalence of inadequacy [POI]), magnesium (96.7% POI), and vitamin D (92.8% POI). Female students showed deficiencies in dietary fiber, calcium (94.0% POI), and folate (92.3% POI). The GDQS revealed that 99.8% of students (37.8% males, 62.0% females) were at high risk for nutrient inadequacy and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The mean carbon footprint analysis showed that male students (5671.55CO₂e) had a higher environmental impact than females (5020.36 CO₂e). Conclusion: Nutrient inadequacy and poor diet quality are highly prevalent among university students, predisposing them to a high risk of NCDs and contributing to a high amount of greenhouse gas emissions. University food environments significantly influence student diets, necessitating policy interventions to promote sustainable food choices while reducing environmental impact.

Indexed as

24-h food recallcarbon footprintdiet qualityenvironmental impactGlobal Diet Quality Scorenutrient adequacysustainabilityuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID41170365
PMCPMC12568394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.