ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2025
Investigating electrophysiological correlates of nonconscious processing of facial expressions using dichoptic forward masking.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affective stimuli, such as fearful faces, are assumed to receive prioritized processing over neutral stimuli, making them easier to detect when perception is suppressed using techniques such as visual masking or binocular rivalry. Moreover, some studies suggest that fearful expressions can be processed outside of conscious awareness, as evidenced by enhanced early event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to subliminally presented fearful vs. neutral faces. This might be associated with increased detection of fear-related stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether increased cortical processing of unseen fearful faces is a necessary condition for detection advantages and whether effects are related to expression-related or low-level features of stimuli. In the present pre-registered ERP study, we addressed these questions using stereoscopic forward masking (FM). Forty-eight male and female participants were presented with fearful and neutral, intact and phase-scrambled faces. The behavioural results showed that masked fearful faces were detected better than neutral faces. Phase-scrambled faces did not show this effect, indicating that the perceptual advantage was not mediated by low-level spectral stimulus properties. ERPs elicited by consciously perceived faces showed typical expression effects in the form of enhanced occipito-temporal negativities in the time range of the N170 and the early posterior negativity (EPN). Crucially, these effects were absent for subjectively invisible faces, as corroborated by Bayesian statistics. Taken together, our results suggest that the perceptual advantage of fearful faces under dichoptic FM cannot be attributed to low-level stimulus properties. Furthermore, within this paradigm, the perceptual advantage does not coincide with the amplification of early ERPs to subjectively invisible faces, suggesting a dissociation between unconscious stimulus processing and stimulus detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.