ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Development and control of a robotic assistant walking aid for fall risk reduction.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Passive wheels on legged robots: a survey.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls are a major risk factor among the elderly, often resulting in injuries that compromise independence and quality of life. Conventional walking aids lack active stabilization capabilities and are therefore limited in effectively preventing balance-related accidents. This paper presents the design and control of a smart robotic assistant aimed at reducing fall risk in elderly users by providing real-time balance support. The proposed system uses a wearable inertial measurement unit to detect postural imbalances in the sagittal (front-back) and frontal (side-to-side) planes. When instability is detected, the robotic arm generates compensatory forces or torques through linear or rotational actuators to help the user regain a stable posture. Using a cascaded control architecture, the outer loop is designed to maintain the user's upright posture, while the inner loop ensures fast and accurate actuator performance. To enable effective and reliable control in the real system, actuator dynamics are characterized through an optimization-based system identification approach, resulting in transfer function models with over 98% accuracy. Based on these models, PID controllers are optimally tuned using an optimization algorithm to ensure fast and accurate corrective action. The system effectively returns the user to a stable position within 2.3 ± 0.3 s for linear actuation (with a response time of 120 ± 10 ms) and 2.2 ± 0.2 s for rotary actuation (with a response time of 140 ± 15 ms), providing safe posture return during imbalance events. To further enhance safety, an automatic braking mechanism immobilizes the walking aid during corrective maneuvers. Experimental validation demonstrates the system's effectiveness in detecting and correcting postural imbalances in both the sagittal and frontal planes under dynamic conditions. These results highlight the potential for enhancing mobility, safety, and therapeutic support for older adults, contributing to the advancement of assistive fall-prevention technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.