ArticleCureus2025
Surgical Outcome of Tethered Cord Syndrome Following Duplicate Filum Terminale Externum Resection in a Patient With Normal Conus Medullaris and Fatty Filum: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe the case of a 38-year-old woman who limped due to a forced antalgic posture involving plantar flexion of the left foot. She exhibited hypoesthesia on the posterior aspect of the left lower limb. The lumbar MRI showed the conus medullaris in a normal position and a fatty filum (FF) extending from L3 to L5, with a maximum diameter of 5.5 mm at L3. A transhiatal approach was performed to section the filum terminale externum (FTE) to achieve spinal cord untethering, and a duplicated FTE was found. The symptoms disappeared immediately but recurred several months later. A second surgical approach was undertaken through a partial sacrectomy via S1-S2 laminectomy, as the section of the FTE did not reveal any other anatomical variants apart from the duplicated FTE, which was sectioned near the inferior part of the dural sac. The symptoms temporarily resolved, but after a few months, they reappeared, presenting differently from the initial symptoms, which involved the proximal parts of the lower limbs. The section of the intradural FF was then performed, and the symptoms disappeared at five years of follow-up. In this case, the potential limitations of the therapeutic capabilities of minimally invasive surgery for section FTE by transhiatal approach, related to the anatomical variation of the duplicate FTE, were eliminated by sectioning the duplicated FTE at the point where the dural sac emerges and by excluding the presence of a duplicate filum terminale internum during the section of the FF. The presence of the FF and its significant thickness should be recognised as a limitation to the effectiveness of the FTE section in treating tethered cord syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.