Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41170240›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Rate and Outcomes of Second Visits to the ED Among Patients Discharged With Non-specific Abdominal Pain in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Munira Alkhashan, Rakan Alsinaideh, Salman Alkhodairy, Mohammed Alqadhibi, Abdulaziz Alanzan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Munira AlkhashanEmergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Rakan AlsinaidehEmergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Salman AlkhodairyEmergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed AlqadhibiGeneral Surgery, King Fahd Specialist Hospital, Qassim, SAU.
Abdulaziz AlanzanAnesthesiology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background It is well documented in the literature that the most common diagnosis for acute abdomen is nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP). The context of NSAP in the literature is either (a) ranking it among other causes of acute abdomen or (b) addressing that some patients revisited the ED with a different diagnosis after being initially labeled with NSAP. These two contexts create a gap, as no article has discussed the characteristics of patients mislabeled with NSAP in KSA. In other words, what might be the risk factors making their presentation nonspecific? In this article, we discuss the characteristics of patients labeled with NSAP who revisited the ED within three days and were subsequently diagnosed with a different condition, if found. Methodology The study was a retrospective cohort study. Data were taken from case files at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using the Best-Care system. All adults who attended the ED and were discharged with the diagnosis of NSAP (ICD code R10.4) between 2015 and 2023 were included. Patients were then tracked for 3 days, which is the cutoff commonly used in ED research. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.3. Categorical variables were summarized using counts and percentages, and continuous variables (normal and non-normal) using mean ± SD and median/IQR. The chi-square test was used to assess associations, and logistic regression analysis was used to predict revisits. Only statistically significant variables were included, and hypothesis testing was performed at a 5% level of significance. Results A total of 932 patients were discharged from the ED with NSAP. Out of these, 69 (7.4%) revisited the ED within 3 days and received a different diagnosis. The study found significant age differences between the two groups: the median age was 40 years (IQR: 27-58) in non-revisited patients and 29 years (IQR: 21-42) in re-visited patients. A higher proportion of re-visited patients had a BMI over 25 (64.1% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001). Surgical history also showed a significant difference, with 39.1% of re-visited patients having a history of abdominal surgery compared to 18.2% of non-revisited patients (p < 0.001). Acute cholecystitis was the most common diagnosis during the second visit, accounting for 32.3% of revisits, followed by appendicitis. Re-visited patients also showed a higher prevalence of hypothyroidism (13.4% vs. 1.27%) and a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes (8.96% vs. 1.27%). Conclusion This retrospective cohort study revealed several significant findings regarding factors associated with ED revisits following an initial discharge with a diagnosis of NSAP. The most common diagnosis identified during the second visit was acute cholecystitis.

Indexed as

appendicitischolecystitisemergency department revisitsernonspecific abdominal pain

Identifiers

PMID41170240
PMCPMC12569719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.